Which federal legislation was enacted in 1995 to restrict the referral of patients to organizations in which providers have a financial interest?

The correct choice is the Stark II laws, which were established to prevent conflicts of interest in healthcare settings. These laws specifically address the issue of physician self-referral, where doctors may refer patients to facilities or services in which they have a financial stake. The intention behind the Stark II laws is to ensure that medical decisions are made based on the best interest of patients rather than financial incentives, thereby maintaining integrity in patient care and promoting fair competition in the healthcare marketplace.

In this context, the Stark II laws enhanced the original Stark I legislation, broadening the scope of prohibited referrals and implementing stricter compliance requirements. This helps protect against overutilization of services and ensures that providers prioritize patient welfare over personal financial gain.

The other options listed do not have the same focus or intent as the Stark II laws. The Federal Anti-Kickback Law addresses the broader issue of illegal remuneration for referrals, while HIPAA pertains primarily to the privacy and security of patient information. The Hill-Burton Act focuses on the construction and modernization of healthcare facilities, with different objectives altogether. Therefore, Stark II laws are the precise answer regarding restrictions on referrals due to financial interests in organizations.